Jump to content

FairBol

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    276

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by FairBol

    @TPatterson

    in Round 9

    Posted

    @TPatterson: Closely monitoring developments in Iran.  Regarding that nation, this may be the best chance for peace that's come along in some time.  Let's not squander this chance.  #Hopeful  

    The Patterson Club

    in Party Offices

    Posted · Edited by FairBol

    Here's a proposed bill for ya that I just wrote.  Thanks to Congressman Raul Labrador of Idaho for the inspiration.  

     

     

    Quote

     

    IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

     

    Mr. PATTERSON, for himself with thanks to Mr. LABRADOR, introduces

     

    A BILL

     

    To prevent discriminatory treatment of any person on the basis of views held with respect to marriage.  

     

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

     

     

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

     

    This Act may be cited as the "First Amendment Defense Act".  

     

    SECTION 2. FINDINGS.

     

    (a) In General.—Congress finds the following:

     

      (1) Protecting religious freedom from Government intrusion is a Government interest of the highest order. Legislatively enacted measures advance this interest by remedying, deterring, and preventing Government interference with religious exercise in a way that complements the protections mandated by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 

     

      (2) Laws that protect the free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions about marriage will encourage private citizens and institutions to demonstrate tolerance for those beliefs and convictions and therefore contribute to a more respectful, diverse, and peaceful society. 

     

      (3) Americans hold a wide range of views on the issue of same-sex marriage. 

     

      (4) Leading legal scholars concur that conflicts between same-sex marriage and religious liberty are real and should be legislatively addressed.

     

    SECTION 3. PROTECTION OF THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND MORAL CONVICTIONS.

     

    (a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, wholly or partially on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

     

     

    (b) Discriminatory Action Defined.—As used in subsection (a), a discriminatory action means any action taken by the Federal Government to—

     

     

      (1) alter in any way the Federal tax treatment of, or cause any tax, penalty, or payment to be assessed against, or deny, delay, or revoke an exemption from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 of, any person referred to in subsection (a);

     

      (2) disallow a deduction for Federal tax purposes of any charitable contribution made to or by such person;

     

      (3) withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any Federal grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, loan, license, certification, accreditation, employment, or other similar position or status from or to such person;

     

      (4) withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any benefit under a Federal benefit program from or to such person; or

     

      (5) otherwise discriminate against such person.

     

    (c) Accreditation; Licensure; Certification.—The Federal Government shall consider accredited, licensed, or certified for purposes of Federal law any person that would be accredited, licensed, or certified, respectively, for such purposes but for a determination against such person wholly or partially on the basis that the person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

     

    SECTION 4. JUDICIAL RELIEF.

     

    (a) Cause Of Action.—A person may assert an actual or threatened violation of this Act as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding and obtain compensatory damages, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or any other appropriate relief against the Federal Government. Standing to assert a claim or defense under this section shall be governed by the general rules of standing under Article III of the Constitution.

     

    (b) Administrative Remedies Not Required.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action under this section may be commenced, and relief may be granted, in a United States district court without regard to whether the person commencing the action has sought or exhausted available administrative remedies.

     

    (c) Attorneys’ Fees.—Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting “the First Amendment Defense Act,” after “the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000,”.

     

    (d) Authority Of United States To Enforce This Act.—The Attorney General may bring an action for injunctive or declaratory relief against an independent establishment described in section 104(1) of title 5, United States Code, or an officer or employee of that independent establishment, to enforce compliance with this Act. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to deny, impair, or otherwise affect any right or authority of the Attorney General, the United States, or any agency, officer, or employee of the United States, acting under any law other than this subsection, to institute or intervene in any proceeding.

     

    SECTION 5. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.

     

    (a) Broad Construction.—This Act shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this Act and the Constitution.

     

    (b) No Preemption, Repeal, Or Narrow Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt State law, or repeal Federal law, that is equally or more protective of free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to narrow the meaning or application of any State or Federal law protecting free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent the Federal Government from providing, either directly or through a person not seeking protection under this Act, any benefit or service authorized under Federal law.

     

    (c) Severability.—If any provision of this Act or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.

     

    SECTION 6. DEFINITIONS.

     

    In this Act:

     

      (1) Federal Benefit Program.—The term “Federal benefit program” has the meaning given that term in section 552a of title 5, United States Code.

     

      (2) Federal Government.—The term “Federal Government” includes each authority of any branch of the Government of the United States.

     

      (3) Person.—The term “person” means a person as defined in section 1 of title 1, United States Code, and includes any such person regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof, and regardless of for-profit or nonprofit status.

     

    SECTION 7. WHEN EFFECTIVE.

     

    This Act shall take effect immediately upon signing by the President of the United States.  

     

     

     

     

     

    Feedback?

    • Like 2

    DEBATE: S.79 Reduce the Deficit Act

    in Archives

    Posted

    Madame President,

     

    I believe that in a rapidly changing world, our military must continue to be ready to respond to any threat, be it foreign or domestic.  We cannot allow our adversaries, which of course include international terrorists, to gain a technological advantage over us. 

     

    In my opinion, the Long-Range Bomber program is a key element of maintaining technological superiority.  As such, I move to amend this bill as such:

    On 7/16/2021 at 3:38 PM, Frank Roberts said:

    The DoDs New Long-Range Bomber program shall be deferred to 2025. ($10,700,000,000 2015-2019)

     

    To clarify, this would strike Section 2 Clause 4 in its entirety.  

     

    I yield.  

    DEBATE: S.88 Everyday American Jobs and Investment Act of 2015

    in 114th Congress House Archives

    Posted · Edited by FairBol

    On 7/21/2021 at 8:33 PM, Lloth said:

    Mr. President,

     

    Could the Gentleman from Louisiana please explain the justification for the tax on unimproved property, essentially, if I understand the bill correctly, and why we are cutting Corporate and Personal income taxes at a time when the deficit many Republicans harp on is so high?

     

    I yield.

     

    Mr. President,

     

    I would also like to hear the reasoning behind this; I ask for clarification from my colleague of the State of Louisiana.  

     

    I yield.  

    Re: Legislative Priorities

    in Party Offices

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Jack said:

     

    Quick question, when you say "personal beliefs", do you mean that of your character or of your real self? I just want to remind you that everything is roleplay here. Rock the boat a little, shake the waters sometime. It makes for great RP.

     

    I hear you on that.  OOC speaking, a lot of my personal beliefs go into my character.  I can rock the boat though, LOL.  

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept