Jump to content

Bolster

Democratic Leadership
  • Posts

    4,496
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    60

Posts posted by Bolster

  1. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

     

     Mr. Stokes for himself introduced the following bill; with thanks to Ms. Sherrill

    A BILL

    To provide funding to summer youth employment programs to expand the availability of subsidized jobs for youths and to develop innovative program activities that improve academic, economic, and criminal justice outcomes for youths, and for other purposes.

     

    Section 1. Short title

    This Act may be cited as the Strengthening Communities through Summer Employment Act.

     

    Section 2. Authorization of appropriations; distribution of funds

    (a) Authorization of appropriations

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Labor to carry out this Act—

    (1) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 2018;

    (2) $210,000,000 for fiscal year 2019;

    (3) $220,000,000 for fiscal year 2020;

    (4) $230,000,000 for fiscal year 2021; and

    (5) $240,000,000 for fiscal year 2022.

    (b) Distribution of funds

    Of the amounts appropriated under subsection (a), the Secretary of Labor shall use—

    (1) 45 percent of such amount to award grants under section 3;

    (2) 45 percent of such amount to award grants under section 4;

    (3) 5 percent of such amount to carry out evaluation activities under section 5(b); and

    (4) 5 percent of such amount to fund the Advisory Board under section 6.

     

    Section 3. Expansion and scaling of summer youth employment programs

    (a) Grants authorized

    From the amounts available under section 2(b)(1), the Secretary of Labor shall award grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities to develop and implement new, or expand existing, summer youth employment programs in a State or local area, for the purpose of improving academic, economic, and criminal justice outcomes for participants, including—

    (1) high school graduation rates;

    (2) enrollment rates in postsecondary education;

    (3) employment and wage rates; and

    (4) arrest, conviction, and incarceration rates.

    (b) Grant prioritization

    In awarding grants to eligible entities under this section, the Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Advisory Board, shall prioritize eligible entities that, based upon the applications submitted under subsection (c)—

    (1) have higher youth unemployment rates and violent crime rates in the local areas to be served;

    (2) will offer higher quality and more rigorous the summer youth employment programs (which shall include a consideration of whether the program has been evaluated and, if so, the impact of the program on the youth outcomes listed under subsection (a)); and

    (3) will serve a higher number of youth historically underserved by summer youth employment programs, including youth in rural and suburban local areas.

    (c) Application requirements

    To be eligible to receive a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, in such manner, and containing such information as the Secretary may determine to be necessary, which shall include information that demonstrates that the eligible entity will use such grant to develop and implement, or expand, a summer youth employment program that includes each of the elements listed in subsection (d).

    (d) Required elements for summer youth employment programs

    A summer youth employment program funded under this section shall include each of the following elements:

    (1) Provides youth participants under the age of 25 with subsidized employment for at least 4 weeks during the summer.

    (2) Pays at least the greater of the applicable Federal, State, or local minimum wage.

    (3) Provides community engagement and outreach to ensure equitable access to the program in terms of awareness, application process, and completion of the hiring process, including documentation of eligibility.

    (4) Matches each youth participant with an employer based on the needs of the employer and the skills and interests of the youth participant.

    (5) Provides coaching and mentoring services for each youth participant to support the participant’s completion of the summer employment program.

    (6) Provides assistance to each youth participant in obtaining educational and employment opportunities after the completion of the program, such as by connecting participants with secondary school programs, postsecondary education opportunities, apprenticeships, career and technical education, or adult job training programs, if applicable.

    (7) Provides training, coaching, and mentoring services, and technical assistance to participating employers to best help such employers structure the job opportunities of the employers to meet the employer’s needs and the support the success of youth participants.

    (8) Provides program supports to youth participants before, during, and after their program (such as digital literacy training, work-readiness opportunities, financial literacy training, specific job training for their summer job placement, and career counseling services).

     

    Section 4. Implementation of innovative program activities

    (a) Grants authorized

    From the amounts appropriated under section 2(b)(2) for this section, the Secretary of Labor shall provide grants, on a competitive basis, to eligible entities that operate summer youth employment programs that include each of the program elements listed in section 3(d) to integrate innovative approaches in carrying out such programs for the purposes of improving the youth outcomes listed under section 3(a).

    (b) Grant prioritization

    In awarding grants to eligible entities under this section, the Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Advisory Board, shall prioritize eligible entities that, based upon the applications submitted under subsection (c)—

    (1) have higher youth unemployment rates and violent crime rates in the local areas to be served;

    (2) will offer a higher quality and more rigorous summer youth employment program (which shall include a consideration of whether the program has been evaluated and, if so, the impact of the program on the youth outcomes listed in section 3(a));

    (3) will offer a higher quality and more rigorous innovative approach for such program (which shall include a consideration of whether that innovative approach has been evaluated and, if so, the impact of the innovative approach on the youth outcomes listed under section 3(a)); and

    (4) will serve a higher number of youth historically underserved by summer youth employment programs, including youth in rural and suburban local areas.

    (c) Application requirements

    To be eligible for a grant under this section, an eligible entity shall submit to the Secretary an application at such time, and in such manner as may be required by the Secretary, which includes a description of the plan to integrate one or more of the innovative approaches listed in subsection (d) into the summer youth employment program operated by the eligible entity.

    (d) Innovative approaches to summer youth employment programs

    An eligible entity that operates a summer youth employment program that includes the required program elements listed in section 3(d) shall use funds received under this section to integrate into such program one or more of the following innovative approaches:

    (1) Individualized mentoring and coaching for youth participants, under which each youth participant—

    (A) before and after the participant starts the program and regularly during the program, meets one-on-one with a dedicated mentor;

    (B) develops a comprehensive success plan with the mentor, including academic and employment goals and the steps needed to achieve such goals;

    (C) receives other support from the mentor, which shall include—

    (i) coaching to overcome barriers that could impact progress in completing the employment received under the summer youth employment program;

    (ii) providing letters of recommendation; and

    (iii) making referrals to educational and social services, where necessary.

    (2) High-quality job training, career counseling, or educational tutoring programs to be delivered in small group settings before the program, on evenings and weekends during the program, and after the program, with the goal of preparing youth participants for future employment, which shall include assisting youth participants—

    (A) with developing resumes and interviewing skills, and financial literacy; and

    (B) in completing a regular high school diploma or its recognized equivalent and literacy classes, if applicable.

    (3) Social-emotional learning for youth participants, including proven interventions to help develop empathy, self-efficacy, positive decision-making, and communication skills.

    (4) Wrap-around financial assistance services, including for food, shelter, and transportation.

    (5) Mental health supports for youth participants, as applicable.

    (6) Substance abuse and addiction treatment supports for youth participants, as applicable.

    (7) The continuation of certain program elements (particularly the individualized mentoring, mental health and behavioral supports, and career counseling), in coordination with their school districts, for a period of time after the employment portion of the program ends to help participants continue their engagement with the education and employment system, with financial assistance available to youth who continue to participate in these program elements after their summer employment has ended.

    (8) The provision of one or more of the program elements listed in section 3(d) virtually to develop digital literacy and remote work skills that are a part of many professional settings.

    (9) The provision of Learn and Earn opportunities, in which participants take postsecondary or training courses during nonsummer months coupled with work experience in related fields during the summer.

    (10) The expansion of private sector opportunities with employers in in-demand occupations or industry sectors (as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102)), such as information technology, health care, life sciences, and vocational careers.

    (11) The development of skill-based digital badges issued by cities that are recognized by high schools, community colleges, and employers.

    (12) The laddering of job opportunities from one summer to the next to enable participants to build skills over multiple summers by progressing from entry-level to more senior positions that further develop soft skills (such as leadership skills) or hard skills (such as technical skills).

    (13) A program element identified by the Advisory Board under section 6(i)(3).

    (14) A new innovative program element that is not identified by the Advisory Board under section 6(i)(3) and is not listed in this subsection, which is—

    (A) proposed by the eligible entity in the application submitted under subsection (b);

    (B) determined by the Secretary, in consultation with the Advisory Board, as being reasonably expected to demonstrate evidence, in the case of an element in which such evidence does not exist, in carrying out the purposes described in subsection (a).

     

    Section 5. Evaluation activities

    (a) Performance measurement assessments

    Beginning not later than 1 year after receiving such grant and for each succeeding year of the grant period, each eligible entity receiving a grant under section 3 or 4, in consultation with the Advisory Board established under section 6, shall develop and implement a performance measurement assessment of such program to assess whether the program is being implemented in a way that meets the requirements of section 3 or 4, respectively.

    (b) Impact evaluations

    (1) In general

    From the amounts appropriated under section 2(b)(3), the Secretary of Labor shall, in consultation with the Advisory Board established under section 6, award a contract to one or more independent research organizations or nonprofit organizations to carry out evaluations to measure the impact of each summer youth employment program that is being supported by a grant awarded under section 3 or 4.

    (2) Requirements of evaluations

    An impact evaluation of a program that is being supported by a grant awarded under section 3 or 4 shall meet the following requirements:

    (A) The evaluation begins not later than 3 years after the program first receives such support.

    (B) The evaluation shall meet each of the following:

    (i) Impact evaluation design and analysis methods are shared with the Advisory Board before the beginning of the evaluation.

    (ii) The evaluation uses administrative data to assess the impact of the program as a whole on participants for 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years after the completion of the program on each of the following:

    (I) High school graduation rates.

    (II) Enrollment rates in postsecondary education.

    (III) Employment and wage rates.

    (IV) Crime rates (such as arrest, arraignment, or incarceration rates).

    (iii) The evaluation uses survey data collected during the program to assess program impacts on short-term changes in soft skills (such as such as interpersonal, communication, and time management skills), academic and career goals, and job readiness.

    (iv) The evaluation uses randomized experimental designs, when feasible, or other research methods that allow for the strongest possible causal inferences when random assignment is not feasible.

    (3) Advisory Board

    In assisting the organization that receives a contract under this subsection, the Advisory Board established under section 6 shall provide additional resources to such organization to carry out the evaluations under this subsection, including assistance with using randomized experimental designs.

     

    Section 6. Advisory Board

    (a) In general

    From the amounts available under section 2(b)(4), the Secretary of Labor shall establish within the Department of Labor an Advisory Board to carry out the duties listed in subsection (i).

    (b) Members

    (1) Number of members

    The Secretary shall determine the number of members to serve on the Advisory Board.

    (2) Appointment and expertise

    Each member of the Advisory Board shall be appointed by the Secretary of Labor, and shall have expertise in designing and administering summer youth employment programs or experience in program evaluation and evidence-based policy in the workforce development field.

    (3) Terms

    (A) In general

    Each member shall be appointed for a term of 4 years, and may be reappointed for subsequent terms by the Secretary.

    (B) Vacancies

    Any member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring before the expiration of the term for which the member’s predecessor was appointed shall be appointed only for the remainder of that term. A member may serve after the expiration of that member’s term until a successor has taken office. A vacancy in the Advisory Board shall be filled in the manner in which the original appointment was made.

    (c) Basic Pay

    (1) Rates of pay

    Except as provided in paragraph (2), Advisory Board Members and staff, including the Chairperson, Vice Chairperson, and Director, shall each be paid at a rate determined by the Secretary.

    (2) Prohibition of compensation of federal employees

    Members of the Advisory Board who are full-time officers or employees of the United States may not receive additional pay, allowances, or benefits by reason of their service on the Advisory Board.

    (d) Travel expenses

    Each member shall receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with applicable provisions under subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code.

    (e) Quorum

    Fifty percent plus one members of the Advisory Board shall constitute a quorum but a lesser number may hold hearings.

    (f) Chairperson; Vice Chairperson

    The Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the Advisory Board shall be designated by the Secretary at the time of the appointment. The term of office of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson shall be 4 years.

    (g) Meetings

    The Advisory Board shall meet monthly and at the call of the Chairperson or a majority of its members.

    (h) Director and staff of Advisory Board; experts and consultants

    (1) Director

    The Advisory Board shall have a Director who shall be appointed by the Chairperson.

    (2) Staff

    The Advisory Board Chairperson may appoint additional personnel as they consider appropriate. Such staff shall provide specific oversight and guidance, pursuant to the functions of the Advisory Board under this section.

    (3) Applicability of certain civil service laws

    The Director and staff of the Advisory Board shall be appointed subject to the provisions of title 5, United States Code, governing appointments in the competitive service.

    (4) Experts and consultants

    The Advisory Board may procure temporary and intermittent services under section 3109(b) of title 5, United States Code.

    (5) Staff of Federal Agencies

    Upon request of the Advisory Board, the head of any Federal department or agency may detail, on a reimbursable basis, any of the personnel of that department or agency to the Advisory Board to assist it in carrying out its duties under this Act.

    (i) Duties

    The Advisory Board shall assist the Secretary in carrying out each of the following:

    (1) Application review

    Reviewing applications submitted by eligible entities under sections 4(d) and 5(b) to ensure that each eligible entity selected to receive a grant under this Act will use such grant as required under this Act.

    (2) Technical assistance

    (A) In general

    Providing technical assistance to eligible entities receiving grants under section 3, for the purpose of assisting such eligible entities to best implement the summer youth employment programs to be assisted with such grants, by identifying existing summer youth employment programs that demonstrate, through evaluations conducted under section 5(b) or through outside studies, that each of the program elements listed in section 3(d) and implemented under such programs have a significant impact on academic, economic, and criminal justice outcomes.

    (B) Working group

    Technical assistance may be provided under subparagraph (A) through the creation and administration of a working group of the administrators of eligible entities to share best practices regarding the implementation of summer youth employment programs.

    (3) Innovative program elements

    (A) Identifying program elements

    Identifying any innovative approaches to summer youth employment programs for purposes of paragraph (13) of section 4(d) that are not listed in section 4(d), which demonstrate or are reasonably expected to demonstrate evidence of improving the youth outcomes listed under section 3(a).

    (B) Approving new program elements

    Providing recommendations to the Secretary with respect to whether any new program element proposed by any eligible entity under section 4(d)(14) demonstrate or are reasonable expected to demonstrate such evidence.

    (4) Database of impact evaluations

    Publishing a database of completed evaluations conducted under section 5(b), which maintains evidence on the impact of programs (including the program elements of programs) supported with grants under this Act.

    (5) Program evaluations

    Providing assistance with respect to impact evaluations described in section 5(b)(3).

     

    Section 7. Definitions

    In this Act:

    (1) Eligible entity

    The term eligible entity means a State (or State board) or unit of general local government (or a local board), or a nonprofit organization, or a consortium of any of such entities.

    (2) Secretary

    The term Secretary means the Secretary of Labor.

    (3) State

    The term State means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

    (4) WIOA terms

    The terms local area, local board, State board, and unit of general local government have the meanings given such terms in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).

     

    PES:

    The Strengthening Communities through Summer Employment Act will create a new competitive grant program within the Department of Labor to fund Summer Youth Employment Program operators. Funded programs will be required to match participating young people with an employer based on the needs of the employers and skills and interests of the youth; provide coaching and mentoring services and job readiness supports such as career counseling and digital literacy training to youth participants; and partner with a research organization to conduct a rigorous evaluation of the program. This legislation will also provide competitive grants to Summer Youth Employment Program operators to  develop and implement innovative approaches to subsidized summer employment that are not already  used by existing programs but show promise in improving economic and criminal justice outcomes for youths, such as individualized and high-dosage mentoring; job training, resume development, and financial literacy classes; and mental health and substance abuse supports where needed.

     

  2. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

     

    Mr. Stokes introduced the following bill; with thanks to Mr. Cartwrigh

    A BILL

    To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide certain purchasing authority for recipients or subrecipients of grants under chapter 53 of title 49 of such Code, and for other purposes.

     

    Section 1. Short title
    This Act may be cited as the Transit Bus Procurement Act.

     

    Section 2. Purchasing authority
    Section 502 of title 40, United States Code, is amended—

    (1)by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
    (2)by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection:

    (f)Use of supply schedules for the purchase of buses

    (1)In general

    The Administrator shall provide access to sources of supply for buses to recipients or subrecipients of Federal assistance under chapter 53 of title 49, United States Code, to obtain buses for use in public transportation.

    (2)Department of Transportation

    The Secretary of Transportation shall restrict access to sources of supply of the General Services Administration to obtain buses to recipients or subrecipients described in paragraph (1) in areas with a population of less than 200,000 and to recipients or subrecipients in areas with a population of 200,000 or more with 100 or fewer buses in fixed route service during peak service hours.

    .

     

    PES

    This bill directs the General Services Administration (GSA) to provide access to GSA sources of supply (schedules) for buses to recipients or subrecipients of federal public transportation grant assistance to purchase buses for public transportation. The Department of Transportation shall restrict schedule access to recipients or subrecipients in areas with a population of: less than 200,000, and 200,000 or more with 100 or fewer buses in fixed route service during peak service hours.

  3. ov2e1gB.png

     

     

    ALT TEXT: The Military At Home. America must take a hard look at it's relationship with the expansion of weapons of war within our local law enforcement agencies. By E.A. Davenport

     

    It has been almost just two years following the deaths of Freddie Gray and Michael Brown. These two men, both killed in the hands of law enforcement were two instances in a growing frustration around misconduct and the lack of accountability within local law enforcement agencies. When we look at the scene of both Baltimore and Ferguson. Protests and uprisings rose as people took to the streets to air out their frustration with a system, they feel has been against them. Many joined in the streets with their hands raised and shouting chats calling for justice. In response local law enforcement met protestors with military paraphernalia and SWAT gear. A response that seems disproportionate to the actions of the protester. Big military style MRAP trucks with snipers perched on the roof of the truck. 

     

    Pause, one must think this sounds like a scene from a military battle oversees but, no this is right here on American soil. We must take a hard look at our relationship to military style weapons on our streets. What makes it even more worrisome is that these are in the hands of those who are sworn to protect us. The reason for this is because of the 1033 program. This program was implemented in 1997 under US Department of Defense appropriations. This granted the Department of Defence to give state, local and federal law enforcement agencies military style hardware. Some of this includes Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) trucks, rifles, military helmets and much more. This program was an addition to the failed war on drugs and has created s sense of strong military presence in our cities as response to peaceful assembly by American citizens. 

     

    fergusoncops.webp?w=737&f=4c271fc914ef72ba8e02b381e8fc2953

     

    In 2015 Senators Rand Paul (R-KY) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) introduced legislation that would halt this rapid and continuously growing overreach by law enforcement. This bill titled the Stop Militarizing Our Law Enforcement Act of 2015 would “prohibit the federal transfer of militarized equipment to state and local law enforcement agencies including, MRAP vehicles, drones and armored vehicles transferred through the U.S. Department of Defense’s 1033, U.S. Department of Justice’s Byrne Justice Assistance Grant, and U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Homeland Security Grant programs.”

     

    As a response to President Obama's 2015 Executive Order which only limited some aquisition of military equipment but was criticized for being only a band-aid on the issue. Paul stated "As a nation, we were shocked by images of police responding to protests in Ferguson, Missouri, outfitted as if going to war. As we rebuild the trust between communities and the police, we have to address the role that the federal government has played in supplying law enforcement with battlefield equipment."

     

    Right now, Republicans are trying to continue the expansion of the police state. Hiding behind the age old Nixonian rhetoric of “tough on crime”. But who are they really trying to crack down on? Looking at the protests across our nation, we see innocent Americans expressing their opinions met by snipers and military trucks. While we must understand that law enforcement is a part of the conversation around reform, we must not create a culture of fear but a culture of community. The future in understanding this relationship can go either way. It is our choice to let it turn the right way and that way is to stop the overreach. 

  4. Name: Nolan A. Stokes (D-MD)

    Media/Outlet: Politics Nation with Rev. Al Sharpton

    Reason: Watford Nomination to SCOTUS

     

    • The point of the matter is this Rev., Republicans have no real opposition the Judge Watford's nomination to the Supreme Court. They have gone as far as using identity politics to discredit Judge Watford, they have delayed his first nomination over the hopes to tip the courts in their favor following the election. They have over politicized the Supreme Court setting dangerous standards of how the check and balance on our government is managed. Republicans have ultimatly obstructed the process for which the Constitution has outlined. And now that their first plan failed, they are using anything and everything to throw out and discredit Judge Watford.
    • Judge Watford is qualified. There is no question or doubt about that. He has a long resume of legal work in private practice, he has had two cases that were appealed to the Supreme Court result in decisions agree with his opinions that have cited judicial precident. To put it in plain and simple terms, he has been an impartial judge, he has always followed what was outlined in the constitution and has held stadfast to upholding the legitimacy of our judicial process.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.