Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Recks

Press Office of Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3)

Recommended Posts

Press Office of

Representative Douglas Seymour

Democrat for South Carolina's 3rd District

 

320px-Flag_of_South_Carolina.svg.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour Re-elected to House

 

rick-perry.jpg

 

ANDERSON, SC - In the 1986 midterm elections, Congressman Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) won re-election to the U.S. House of Representatives. A noted Southern Democrat, Seymour has served the people of South Carolina's 3rd district in Congress since he was first elected in 1974. "It is a great honor and privilege to have been re-elected to serve the people of South Carolina's 3rd - ranging from Clemson to Anderson, from Aiken to Greenwood, and many great communities in between," Seymour said during his election-night victory speech. "I am honored to be a part of the Democratic victories this election cycle, but I know that we cannot afford to rest on our laurels. We need to get down to work in Washington, DC for the average man and woman across this great nation," Seymour said.

 

The veteran Congressman also hinted at some of his legislative priorities, saying, "I want to do what's best for the 3rd district, for South Carolina, and for our nation as a whole. I firmly believe that when our district succeeds, our nation succeeds. And when our nation succeeds, our district succeeds. In particular I'm interested in protecting the tens of thousands of textile jobs in the Carolinas, and to fight childhood poverty to eradicate the cyclical trends that we've seen for far too long." Before being sworn in for his seventh term as a Congressman, Seymour also stood as a conservative Democrat candidate for the House Majority Whip, a contest he narrowly lost. "I'm always looking for ways to advance good, sound policy for my state and district, and my resolve remains unwavering on that front," Seymour concluded in a statement to the press.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour Seeks to Protect Textile Industry

 

24337626529_1264867237_b.jpg

 

ANDERSON, SC - In his first act of the 100th Congress, Representative Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) introduced the Protecting American Textile Manufacturing Act, a comprehensive bill that would enhance the competitiveness of the American industries for textiles, textile products, and nonrubber footwear. "Hundreds of thousands of South Carolinians are impacted directly by the textile sector of our economy. It is a vital part of our state's character, and essential to our nation's well-being. That is why I am so passionate about securing the passage of this bill through Congress - and why it is my number one priority this session," Seymour said in a statement.

 

The bill has five key sections which contribute to the overall promotion and protection of the American textile industry. First, textile imports from the Soviet Union are prohibited. "We cannot allow our economic and military rival undercut our prices and destabilize a whole segment of our nation's economy," Seymour said. The bill would also gradually increase the amount of imports of textiles, textile products, and nonrubber footwear permissible under law at a growth factor of 1% per year. The Protecting American Textile Manufacturing Act would also put related customs duties towards modernizing the textile industry, and lay out parameters for the President to negotiate trade arrangements. "This is a commonsense bill which has already attracted big-name bipartisan support," said Seymour in his statement. "I look forward to the eventual passage of this piece of legislation and the jobs savings across South Carolina and the 3rd district."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour Introduces Sweeping Anti-Poverty Legislation

 

Perry-On-Mic.jpg

 

WASHINGTON, DC - U.S. Representative Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) recently introduced his second piece of legislation in the 100th Congress, this time focused on fighting the scourge of poverty. "Poverty impacts far too many Americans, far too many South Carolinians. And the impact, which is especially acute on children, has vast intergenerational implications. That is why I am proud to champion the Fighting Childhood Poverty Act," Seymour said in a statement after introducing the bill to the House hopper. The Fighting Childhood Poverty Act would positively impact at least 950,000 Americans currently living in poverty by expanding the scope of existing anti-poverty tools. "While we've made progress in the past decade, South Carolina remains above the national average for poverty, and I believe that this legislation is important to help fight for our state and district."

 

The bill first extends the Targeted Jobs Tax Credit (which is used to incentivize firms to hire poorer, unemployed Americans) by an additional two years. It then increases the dependent care tax credit for those who fall under the poverty level. "The purpose of the expanded dependent care credit," Seymour said, "is to defray the cost of childcare for working class American families." The bill also expands Medicaid for those children and pregnant mothers who fall substantially below the federal poverty level and appropriates $350 million between the Head Start education program and the Job Training Partnership Act. Finally, the bill allows for certain grants to states to experiment with Aid to Families with Dependent Children. "Poverty is a real epidemic, and fighting for American children to escape this cycle is a must," Seymour concluded his statement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rep. Seymour: Time to Encourage Education Savings

 

image_wqxga.jpg

 

CLEMSON, SC - U.S. Representative Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) recently spoke at a meeting of the Clemson University Democrats, addressing his latest legislative initiative that would make college more affordable for millions of Americans. "I believe that the way of the future will have many more Americans pursuing higher education degrees through universities like this one here in Clemson.  But the price of investing in one's potential future earnings is ever-increasing, which reduces return-on-investment. That is why I have just introduced the Higher Education Savings Act in the hopper of the United States House of Representatives," Seymour told the young adults.

 

"My bill will create an income tax exclusion up to the amount of higher education expenses for parents, spouses, and students themselves who pay for their tuition, books, et cetera with U.S. savings bonds," Seymour explained. Seymour's bill also requires the Treasury Secretary to make the public aware of the tax advantages conferred under this program, which would help reduce the effective cost of attending a university or vocational school. "With the 21st century looming on the horizon, and global competition just getting stiffer, Americans need to continue their innovative spirit of entrepreneurship - and the tools provided by post-secondary education to do that must be a national priority. Now is the time to encourage education savings, and I'm proud to be on the forefront of this vital issue in our nation's capital," Seymour concluded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour Introduces Legislation to Hold Congress Accountable

 

8761905_web1_perry-confirmation_011917ev_008_8761905.jpg?w=640

 

WASHINGTON, DC - Representative Douglas Seymour, Democrat from South Carolina's 3rd District, recently introduced a sweeping piece of legislation that would hold Congress and the federal judiciary accountable to the same anti-discrimination law - the Civil Rights Act of 1964 - that applies elsewhere for vital employment decisions. "Look," Congressman Seymour told the press upon the bill's introduction, "I have long stood against unjust hiring practices that single out qualified individuals on the basis of their race, sex, or handicap. It is only logical that we force the United States Congress and our judicial branch of government to legally be held to the same standards that we do for federal agencies and private employers."

 

Seymour acknowledged that he was unaware of any major discriminatory suits pending with respect to the various congressional staffs of each member, but stated, "The idea that Congress should get a carve-out to this landmark piece of legislation is simply wrong on its face. While Constitutional guarantees of equal protection do apply here," Seymour said, "giving prospective employees stronger legal grounds makes it easier to root out bad actors in the legislative and judicial branches of government." The Congressional and Judicial Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1987 would allow exemptions for political affiliation and residency for Congress, but would establish the Employment Review Board (consisting of retired federal judges) to oversee the enforcement of the law. "This is a serious bill, because it covers a serious topic. Representing the good folks down here in South Carolina, and having a record of supporting Supreme Court decisions against discrimination, I trust that this bill will receive the consideration is deserves."

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour, Kaine Reach AIDS Compromise

 

gettyimages-632097372.jpg?w=1500

 

WASHINGTON, DC - Congressman Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) recently met with the Reverend Rep. Anderson Kaine (R-IL-20) to discuss a reform to the AIDS Prevention and Information Act of 1987, which is currently being debated before the House Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP). Seymour had expressed concerns regarding the price tag associated with the piece of legislation, which appropriated over $4 billion dollars to AIDS testing and various other grants. "It is undeniable that AIDS is a problem in our society, but to pour billions of dollars into testing is not the answer. This bill is fiscal insanity, and would move us away towards the desired long-term goal of fiscal stability," Seymour said during the HELP debate. To that end, Congressman Seymour approached Reverend Kaine, who had also expressed concerns over the lack of accountability and wrong message sent by the bill.

 

Seymour, who frequently reaches across the aisle, voted not to table the underlying bill but instead introduced an amendment to the AIDS Prevention and Information Act of 1987 that would reduce the total price tag by about 4-and-a-half times. The Seymour I amendment also clarifies that instruction for youth should only apply to at-risk youth. Finally, Congressmen Seymour and Kaine's arrangement would ensure that educational and counseling services funded by the federal appropriation would place a particular focus on sexual abstinence. "We know how to prevent AIDS - its as simple as abstaining from extramarital and premarital sexual relations. Any education program that we fund as a nation must promote moral behavior, and that is a key piece of the Seymour I amendment in HELP." The amendment looks set to pass committee, and Seymour has announced that he will support the bill-as-amended in a final committee vote.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour Speaks on Family Values

 

img.jpg

 

ANDERSON, SC - At a meeting of Southern Baptist leaders in South Carolina, Congressman Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) recently discussed his strong and passionate support for family values. "I'm here today not to pontificate about politics of division and discord, but rather to speak to the truth that is God's love for us, and His institution of basic societal institutions - the most fundamental one being the family. There is no denying that the basic bedrock of America is the family, today just as it has been since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock. They knew that Divine Providence would oversee their journey, and they knew that they could rely upon the family as an institution given to us by the Almighty," Seymour said.

 

The local Congressman and Southern Baptist adherent then spoke about a few legislative happenings in Washington, DC that relate to the primacy of family relations. "You may well know, but I'm a proud co-sponsor of legislation to defund abortion federally, and to limit marriage to one-man and one-woman. These are issues that we have to get right: lives are literally depending on us. Taxpayer funded abortion is despicable, and I was proud to vote for the strictest version of this bill in the HELP Committee, and we saw an important version pass through that committee. As for the Defense of Marriage Act, I believe that it is commonsense to allow states to pick their own marriage policy. Some cry states' rights, but trust me - this bill only empowers states further to make the right choice when it comes to the holy union of marriage. Finally, my own bill that helps families is the Fighting Childhood Poverty Act." This bill is currently up for consideration before the HELP Committee and would create tax incentives, among other things, to fight poverty. "We need to ensure all American children can get ahead, and through education, early childhood healthcare, and work programs, we're on track to do just that," Seymour concluded.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seymour: Let's Cherish the Second Amendment

 

rick_perry6_091610_merten.jpg

 

WASHINGTON, DC - Today, Congressman Douglas Seymour (D-SC-3) received an internal promotion from the House Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to the more prestigious Committee on Armed Services, Foreign Affairs, and the Judiciary (ASFAJ). His elevation came during a time of votes on the ASFAJ committee - an essential duty of any committee-member. One bill up for consideration is the Responsible Gun Ownership Act, which would prohibit the ownership of loosely defined "assault weapons," along with background check provisions that are unenforceable. "I have just voted against recommending the Responsible Gun Ownership Act to the full House for consideration. Not only is it a half-hearted attempt at creating a federal background check system, but it also bans whole groups of arms from public ownership. Let's cherish the Second Amendment, not attempt to undermine it," Seymour said to the press upon leaving the committee room.

 

"The bill in question is simply not the right piece of legislation for our nation. Our Founding Fathers embraced the Second Amendment as necessary to the security of a free nation. I'm a proud, responsible gun-owner, and I believe that gun rights must be protected. Of course, violent criminals should not have access to these weapons, but the current bill is nothing but a poor excuse for a mandate. There's no enforcement mechanism, not way that the background checks would be carried out," Seymour said. Addressing the proposal to ban assault weapons, Seymour expressed deep concern over the ambiguous definitions provided by the bill. "The bill prohibits possession of assault weapons, but fails to provide a real definition of an assault weapon, instead classifying them in with machine guns. Well, just last year I joined a bipartisan group of legislators to pass the Firearm Owners Protection Act, which prohibited transfer and possession of all new machine guns! So, either this section is a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing aimed at an ever-expanding definition of assault weapons, or it is simply redundant." Regardless, Seymour said, he opposed the bill on sound policy-making grounds in addition to pro-Second Amendment reasons. "We cannot go passing pie-in-the-sky proposals that sound good but cannot be implemented by the federal government. That is why I voted no on this gun control measure."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.